FOREIGN AID?

 

Another Security Leak For Political Gain...

The Commander In Chief Of the U.S. Armed Forces, the President of the United States, is not required, nor can he be compelled to disclose information by taking action or not, or by responding to allegations from political opponents as to a matter of national security, as any such action, response or
comment may hinder or endanger the safety and well being of armed forces personnel and civilian operatives.

The challenge presented by Democrats in conjunction with a "news" story, leaked to the media, to attempt to make the President comment on whether he has taken action or not on a particular issue may have already done irreparable and deadly damage and cost the lives of U.S. Personnel or our Allies, due to strategic, logistical, and tactical disclosures.

The use of issues like this by the President's political opponents constitutes a blatant disregard for the lives of those involved and for the national safety and security of the U.S.

Those responsible must be held accountable for the human and material costs and results.

CHICOMS REVISE VIRUS STATS

The News Agency, Reuters, said today that Zhao Lijian, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, is asserting that there has never been a cover-up of the coronavirus outbreak in China, and that the (Chinese) government does not allow any coverups.

Reuters:

"...Zhao told reporters at a daily briefing that the revision of the case toll in Wuhan, where the epidemic first emerged in late 2019, was the result of a statistical verification to ensure accuracy and that revision is a common international practice..."

This, according to Reuters, was a follow up statement after which Wuhan's health authority, earlier on Thursday revised up its cumulative death toll by 50% to 3,869 to rectify what it called incorrect reporting, delays and omissions.  (Full Reuters report HERE)

The statement from the Chinese also comes a day after Fox News' Bret Baier published an "exclusive" report in which he premised that:

"...There is increasing confidence that the COVID-19 outbreak likely originated in a Wuhan laboratory, though not as a bioweapon but as part of China's attempt to demonstrate that its efforts to identify and combat viruses are equal to or greater than the capabilities of the United States..."

Baier said multiple sources interviewed by Fox News had revealed actions by the Chinese Communist government which pointed to what may be "...the costliest government cover-up of all time..."

The Fox News assertions include the following:

• "...The sources believe the initial transmission of the virus – a naturally occurring strain that was being studied there – was bat-to-human and that "patient zero" worked at the laboratory, then went into the population in Wuhan..."
• "...The 'increasing confidence' comes from classified and open-source documents and evidence, the sources said. Fox News has requested to see the evidence directly. Sources emphasized -- as is often the case with intelligence -- that it’s not definitive and should not be characterized as such. Some inside the administration and the intelligence and epidemiological communities are more skeptical, and the investigation is continuing..."
• "...What all of the sources agree about is the extensive cover-up of data and information about COVID-19 orchestrated by the Chinese government..."

You can read the full Fox News report HERE

The back-and-forth between the Chinese Communists, who appear to be scrambling to counter American allegations that China has been at fault in the spread of the Coronavirus, due to strong suspicions that it has not being fully forthcoming about the virulence of the virus, and the Americans' looking to assign accountability for the perceived shortcomings by the Chinese, is given even greater context, as U.S. President Donald Trump took action to suspend payment of funds to the World Health Organization (WHO), which Trump has alleged contributed heavily to a cover-up.

The controversy continues to cloud and overshadow the Trump Administrations' efforts to reopen the U.S., after actions to thwart the effects of the Coronavirus have resulted in the paralysis of major parts of the U.S. economy.

TRUMP TRUMPS THE ANTI TRUMP LEFTIES AGAIN !

There have been several attempts by the deep state to get the Trump Administration (and the nation) involved in some kind of QUAGMIRE, but to date, President Trump has not only resisted the urgings by deep staters, he has effectively thwarted their efforts on more than one occasion.

There was the U.S. Drone "downed" by Iran, that brought us to the "brink." And now there's the Turkish invasion of Syria.

All manner of criticism has emerged because Trump has stuck to his guns and refused to enter the proverbial QUAGMIRE.

Remember that word: Quagmire.  That's what the Lefties called the Viet Nam War.  A Quagmire.  It's what some referred to our going into the Midde East as. A Quagmire.  Lefties refer to Afghanistan as A Quagmire.

Here's the gist of one critic via your favorite media scoundrel, the New York Times:

A New York Times hit-piece on President Donald Trump by David E. Sanger, headlining on the Drudge Report epitomizes the anti-Trump hysteria that prefers the dichotomy of old school invading, occupying and nation building versus capitulation to anti-war Socialist clamoring.  

This phenomenon, of course is what politicians other than Trump have continually "entrapped" themselves in, as a "damned if you do; damned if you don't," scenario that gives both "sides" of a false set of choices, but the opportunity to advance their political agendas.  

In a lengthy diatribe Sanger tries to weave his tangled web of justifications to prove that Trump is incapable and failing in foreign policy.  However, the failure is not Trump, who once again has acted "outside of the box" to fulfill his promises to his Constituents.  The failure is Sanger's inability to cope with anything that does not fit his (and those that agree with him) convenient construct that always sets up the U.S. in a lose-lose situation with regard to foreign policy.

And so, Sanger paints "the calamity" of Trump's choices with regard to Syria, Turkey, the Kurds, etc.

Never mind that the events following Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria, clearly show the carnage hungry Turks, the Blood Letting Syrians, and the Russian vultures salivating for the rivers of blood that now result in that cradle of violence.

Sanger and his ilk obviously are not able to see outside of, nor think or compute without the addiction to blood soup, and Sanger, as the voice of these Middle East leeches, throws a tantrum on the pages of the New York Times.  

When Trump claims the football and comes home, and says that he's not going to trap the U.S. in a quagmire in order to satisfy our enemies abroad and within, it upsets those addicted to Anti-U.S. policies.

Nor is this "extraction" similar to the Obama withdrawal from Iraq, which created a vacuum, and led to the emergence and expansion of ISIS, as Sanger claims.  Nope.  Here there's a big difference.  We, to a great degree obliterated ISIS, while Obama helped it to emerge.  We leave the area by assigning responsibility for Peace in the area to the players that are left there today, while Obama colluded with and advanced the cause of terror state, Iran

Let THEM fight their own wars.  Let THEM deplete their own resources.  Let THEM turn their towns and cities into rubble. 

Let THEM suffer their own casualties. Let THEM bankrupt their economies.  Let THEM emerge from their blood lust in ten years, wasted and degraded.

Let us grow, flourish, and advance and become MORE powerful.  Then, if it's prudent, we can go in and pick up the pieces.

Here is the link to the Sanger regurgitation.  I caution that you might at the very least feel nauseated with that bucket of bile.  

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-followed-his-gut-on-syria-calamity-came-fast/ar-AAILbg6    

No war. No Quagmire. No War Monger to bash.

Sounds like a song, doesn't it?

No War,

No Quagmire

No War Monger To Bash!

Trump Trumps Again.

On The Money ...

A New York Times hit-piece on President Donald Trump by David E. Sanger, headlining on the Drudge Report, epitomizes the anti-Trump hysteria that prefers the dichotomy of old school invading, occupying and nation building versus capitulation to anti-war Socialist clamoring. 

This phenomenon, of course is what politicians other than Trump have continually "entrapped" themselves in, as a "damned if you do; damned if you don't," scenario that gives both "sides" of a false set of choices, but the opportunity to advance their political agendas. 

In a lengthy diatribe Sanger tries to weave his tangled web of justifications to prove that Trump is incapable and failing in foreign policy.  However, the failure is not Trump, who once again has acted "outside of the box" to fulfill his promises to his Constituents.  The failure is Sanger's inability to cope with anything that does not fit his (and those that agree with him) convenient construct that always sets up the U.S. in a lose-lose situation with regard to foreign policy.

And so, Sanger paints "the calamity" of Trump's choices with regard to Syria, Turkey, the Kurds, etc.
Never mind that the events following Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria, clearly show the carnage hungry Turks, the Blood Letting Syrians, and the Russian vultures salivating for the rivers of blood that now result in that cradle of violence.

Sanger and his ilk obviously are not able to see outside of, nor think or compute without the addiction to blood soup, and Sanger, as the voice of these Middle East leeches, throws a tantrum on the pages of the New York Times. 

When Trump claims the football and comes home, and says that he's not going to trap the U.S. in a quagmire in order to satisfy our enemies abroad and within, it upsets those addicted to Anti-U.S. policies.

Nor is this "extraction" similar to the Obama withdrawal from Iraq, which created a vacuum, and led to the emergence and expansion of ISIS, as Sanger claims.  Nope.  Here there's a big difference.  We, to a great degree obliterated ISIS, while Obama helped it to emerge.  We leave the area by assigning responsibility for Peace in the area to the players that are left there today, while Obama colluded with and advanced the cause of terror state, Iran

Let THEM fight their own wars.  Let THEM deplete their own resources.  Let THEM turn their towns and cities into rubble.  Let THEM suffer their own casualties. Let THEM bankrupt their economies.  Let THEM emerge from their blood lust in ten years, wasted and degraded.

Let us grow, flourish, and advance and become MORE powerful.  Then, if it's prudent, we can go in and pick up the pieces.

Here is the link to the Sanger regurgitation.  I caution that you might at the very least feel nauseated with that bucket of bile.   Shame on Drudge for its Anti-Trump aggregation:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-followed-his-gut-on-syria-calamity-came-fast/ar-AAILbg6   

... Vanguard of Freedom ...

TRUMP NAMES TREASONOUS FBI STAFF:

TRUMP: I DON'T DO COVER UPS

House of Representatives Socialist Democrats met today before the Schumer and Pelosi meeting with President Trump and had a clashing of the minds about Impeaching President Donald Trump.

Reportedly, the debate was intense and the disagreements plenty.

Without an incident to precipitate a unified effort by the socialists to Impeach the President, there remained a House divided, and the logical leftist political move then would be for Pelosi and Schumer, upon meeting with the President, to do just that: Precipitate an incident with the President with which they could then justify jumping aboard the Impeachment train.

It might not have been this simple, but it appears the opening salvos of the Trump-Pelosi-Schumer meeting went like this:  "We're going to impeach you.  Now, let's you work with us to help us do so."  Trump, of course, refused and walked out.

Mission accomplished.

Chris Stirewalt on the Fox News noon show was quick to call Trump childish in his reaction to Pelosi and Schumer, but when challenged by a panel member about it, added that all of them were being childish, and that Americans deserve better.

Better than what?  A booming economy; the lowest unemployment rates ever? Lower taxes? Etc.

The Democrat Socialists have nothing to stand on for the upcoming elections, unless Trump succumbs, as did George Bush, to start a war somewhere, with which they could hammer Trump incessantly.

Bush was quite popular, after Nine-Eleven, and it took a constant anti war barrage by Democrats to cut him down to size, and when they did, they gave us Barack Obama.

Trump, of course, is not George Bush, and today vowed "no more legislation while under investigation... ' I don't do cover-ups ' ..."