HOME ... RED CLIX HEADLINERS ... NEWS ... PERSPECTIVES ... VANGUARDS ... BEHIND ENEMY LINES ... ADVANCE OF FREEDOM ... AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE CULTURAL REVOLUTION ...SURVIVORS OF SOCIALISM ... SPIRIT OF FREEDOM... RENAISSANCE OF FREEDOM ...
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
On The Money ...
A New York Times hit-piece on President Donald Trump by David E. Sanger, headlining on the Drudge Report, epitomizes the anti-Trump hysteria that prefers the dichotomy of old school invading, occupying and nation building versus capitulation to anti-war Socialist clamoring.
This phenomenon, of course is what politicians other than Trump have continually "entrapped" themselves in, as a "damned if you do; damned if you don't," scenario that gives both "sides" of a false set of choices, but the opportunity to advance their political agendas.
In a lengthy diatribe Sanger tries to weave his tangled web of justifications to prove that Trump is incapable and failing in foreign policy. However, the failure is not Trump, who once again has acted "outside of the box" to fulfill his promises to his Constituents. The failure is Sanger's inability to cope with anything that does not fit his (and those that agree with him) convenient construct that always sets up the U.S. in a lose-lose situation with regard to foreign policy.
And so, Sanger paints "the calamity" of Trump's choices with regard to Syria, Turkey, the Kurds, etc.
Never mind that the events following Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria, clearly show the carnage hungry Turks, the Blood Letting Syrians, and the Russian vultures salivating for the rivers of blood that now result in that cradle of violence.
Sanger and his ilk obviously are not able to see outside of, nor think or compute without the addiction to blood soup, and Sanger, as the voice of these Middle East leeches, throws a tantrum on the pages of the New York Times.
When Trump claims the football and comes home, and says that he's not going to trap the U.S. in a quagmire in order to satisfy our enemies abroad and within, it upsets those addicted to Anti-U.S. policies.
Nor is this "extraction" similar to the Obama withdrawal from Iraq, which created a vacuum, and led to the emergence and expansion of ISIS, as Sanger claims. Nope. Here there's a big difference. We, to a great degree obliterated ISIS, while Obama helped it to emerge. We leave the area by assigning responsibility for Peace in the area to the players that are left there today, while Obama colluded with and advanced the cause of terror state, Iran
Let THEM fight their own wars. Let THEM deplete their own resources. Let THEM turn their towns and cities into rubble. Let THEM suffer their own casualties. Let THEM bankrupt their economies. Let THEM emerge from their blood lust in ten years, wasted and degraded.
Let us grow, flourish, and advance and become MORE powerful. Then, if it's prudent, we can go in and pick up the pieces.
Here is the link to the Sanger regurgitation. I caution that you might at the very least feel nauseated with that bucket of bile. Shame on Drudge for its Anti-Trump aggregation:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-followed-his-gut-on-syria-calamity-came-fast/ar-AAILbg6
... Vanguard of Freedom ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment