Friday, July 27, 2018

YOU and the "Shadow Ban"



Twitter "shadow banning" is censorship of conservatives. Facebook has been doing the same.  And while these social media entities may be feeling the backlash from it with the loss of "users / subscribers," what about the so called, "Main Stream Media?"

The Main Stream Media has been censoring conservatives since time immemorial.  Those that have the viewpoint that in the "good old days," ... "The Media" was objective, just do not know the history of being a conservative and/or being a conservative IN the media.

Back in the "good old days" there was NO alternative. There was no alternative to socialist media (which then disguised itself as "objective.")  The "MEDIA" did not suddenly let it's hair down and voluntarily show itself to be biased against conservatives.  Their mask was ripped off by conservatives who began using alternative media to get their message out.

The one that stands out as the major pioneer of alternative media (conservative) was Rush Limbaugh. His vehicle was A.M. Radio.  There were others, but he tuned it into a fine art, and then others followed: Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, and others.

Then came FOX news.  MORE of the conservative message got out via FOX, but mainly, back, then, it was a REPUBLICAN message. Back then REPUBLICAN was conflated with "conservative."

Eventually conservatives began to filter out the Socialist Republicans, and that is still evolving today, even as more people realize that what conservatives are doing is CONSERVING the constitution.  "Conservatives," have refined CONSERVATIVE to mean to PRESERVE and CONSERVE the U.S. Constitution.

To be more specific, a political conservative is not a hoity toity, rich, pinky-extending snob that sips champagne with other elite tyrannical snobs.  Those might be "country club Republicans (and Socialist elites).  Conservatives want to preserve and conserve the Constitution.

That makes conservatives, REVOLUTIONARIES.  It makes them so, much more so, than Marxists, much more so, than Communists and Socialists, and in fact, it makes Communists and Socialists COUNTER-Revolutionaries, something they purport NOT to be.

In fact, U.S. POLITICAL CONSERVATIVES are primarily the ONLY true revolutionaries in the world, and are revolutionary against the global, largely Marxist, Socialist, and Communist movements and nations.

U.S. political Conservatives are the TRUE Americans, as they defend and protect our Constitution, which makes those that are anti-conservative, "Anti-American."  That would be why they are so quick to apologize for and/or attack our cultural institutions.

So "social" entities that oppress conservatives via censorship or other means are ANTI AMERICAN.

That makes the mainstream media, and social media VERY anti-American.

Yet the television, radio and print media do not have algorithms to help with censorship. What they do instead is outrightly attack conservatives and discriminate against them by denying them a voice and an opinion.  They, in fact, are, with their vast moneyed resources, making in-kind contributions to political organizations, candidates, causes, etc., and should be outed for it, and should be accountable for it.  Their propaganda should count as political contributions to political causes. Do the math, and calculate their effects in dollars, and you begin to get the idea.

Their "donations" are not just FOR their causes or candidates, they are also AGAINST conservatives.  Add that to the equation.

In the possibly distracting debate about how FACEBOOK and TWITTER, and YOU TUBE, etc., are discriminating against Conservatives, we must not forget the outright attack on free speech by political hacks, who hide behind the protective skirts of the 1st Amendment, pretending to be journalists, while their Anti-American propaganda assaults our Constitutional Republic day after day without them having to account for their criminality.

WE THE PEOPLE should continue to expose them, and make them answer for their crimes.

Countless numbers of Conservative "keyboard warriors" collectively blog, post, and advance the America First, Pro Constitution Conservative causes every day, and more and more are joining the ranks of this grass-root movement.

They are the Tea Party, the Trumper's, the hard-core principled conservatives, the true revolutionaries, and the ONLY ones on the entire planet that have refused to succumb and submit to the Big Government, Royalist, Marxist, Communist, Socialist oppressors, and who are not only taking America back, making it great again, but EXPORTING (as in BREXIT) our revolutionary ideas, turning our national struggle into a worldwide movement.

NEVER in the history of this nation, or the world, has there ever been such a large group of Constitutionalists with such enormous resources, talent, purpose, education and intellect.  Compare today to 1776.  There have been, since then, enormous technical advances, giving US enormous advantages.

Even the surreptitious covert implants on social media, the algorithms that prohibit the dissemination and communication of our ideas, and the attack dogs of "mainstream media," have not and will not stop us.

The revolution that our forefathers began is much more achievable today than it was then.  We continue to succeed against gargantuan odds.  Today the Chinese, the Russians, the Radical Muslims, and every other petty tyrannical dictator, every drug cartel baron, every criminal enterprise, all continue to operate as if 1776 had never happened.

The tyranny of the operators of Facebook, Twitter, You Tube, have bought into the criminality of the past, and yet WE continue to prevail. 

What will happen when those tools are used to disseminate and expand Freedom into the territories enslaved by today's tyrants.  Those "governments" will be no more. Their demise will occur sooner than later.

Marxism is not inevitable. YOU have made it so.

Think about that before bed each day: YOU, the Vanguard of Freedom, are going to prevail.



Tuesday, May 22, 2018

WHERE. ARE. THEY?




It takes courage to stand up against the authority of a group you belong to that has become tyrannical.

You could say that doing so carries a price.

You might say THAT is the the Price of Freedom.

Most Germans did not stand up to the Nazis.

On the other hand, SOME British Subjects stood up to King George.  They paid the price.  They earned FREEDOM for YOU.

The key word here is COURAGE.

Confronted by tyranny, what will you do?

You could think positive thoughts.  You could pray, but if you don't carry through your thoughts into actions, then you have become the tyrant, doing as the tyrant wants you to do, and tacitly complying, and in effect, being the tyrant.

There's the classic Nazi proverbial excuse: "We were following orders."

Where is this going?

It's going HERE:

We don't have to like Trump.  We don't have to agree on anything he does or says.

But we now see that Trump was spied on. He was spied on by One, Two, maybe more spies.  Who commissioned the spies?

We know already that former Director of the CIA, John Brennan spied on Congress.  We already know former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied, when he said the NSA was not spying on Americans.

Now we KNOW that certain individuals within Intelligence agencies and police agencies spied on a political campaign, and THUS attempted to interfere in an election, and when they failed, they continued to try to usurp YOUR VOTES, and now continue to do so.

They continue to hide their operations through various forms of refusal to comply with orders from YOUR Representatives to divulge information about their insurrection, charging even that disclosure would harm our "democracy."

What they fear from disclosure is the inevitable gallows that awaits them, because they have already done the damage of destroying our REPUBLIC, by trashing our Constitution, weaponizing the force and power of your government, the power of Life and Death, and threats against YOU at the point of THEIR guns.

They have and continue to usurp and overthrow YOUR decisions, YOUR intent, YOUR votes to carry on with their Tyranny, and now even issue threats against your representatives and therefore YOU.

Your quiet response is mistaken by the tyrants as submission, but I submit that they are grossly mistaken.  There is no doubt what your response will be to tyrants and tyranny.  The tyrants mistake your patience and wisdom for complacency, and, in error, continue their offensive against YOU, relying on their fellow tyrants in the propaganda media, and those that believe their lies.

It doesn't matter how many spies, or who they used.  They have already sinned. Note their responses.  Are they remorseful?  Or are they arrogant and are they still defending their transgression?

And what of COURAGE?  What of action?  What of those, who you PAY to protect you?

What of those that YOU authorize to use force to act on your behalf?

What of that so called, "rank and file?"

What of the "good guys?"

What are THEY doing now?

They have the guns, the ammunition, supplied by YOU.  Why are they not acting to correct the mistakes of those among them, some of them, their leaders?

Their power is there.

Why do they not use it to protect you?

That's what they signed up for.

That is their DUTY.

WHERE ARE THEY?

Have they chosen to be complicit?  Are they just following orders? Are they resigned or committed to obey the tyrants and to NOT protect you?

What oath have they taken?

Did they take an oath to protect YOU or THEM?

When the smoke clears and YOU run out of patience, what will be their answer to your questions:

"Where were you when my children needed your protection from the the tyrants?"

"Where were YOU, when the tyrants were extinguishing the flame of Freedom for us and our families?"

WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

Find them now.  Implore them to work on your behalf, NOW.

Tell them to use the power of force that you grant them to detain and arrest the perpetrators of tyranny, so that they may be accountable for their crimes.

Tell them to come forth and testify against the perpetrators of tyranny.

Urge them to come out publicly and denounce those who have gone astray.

Do so now, before you have to bypass them, and are required by your concern for your children and their future, to do the work "the good guys" should have done for YOU.


Vanguard of Freedom



Friday, May 4, 2018

The Capitalist



Hillary says she's a capitalist. That's another reason she advances about why she lost the election.

It's very enlightening statement, that one.

A lot of Americans chose a capitalist as President, a businessman. Let's just say he LEANS a bit more than she does toward capitalism, eh?

Let's just say SHE leans a wee bit to the LEFT.

Let's just say that after a revolution, communist or otherwise, you still have to balance the budget, pay the piper, reconcile your checking accounts, pay the credit cards, and count the pennies you have left.

After the butchering, after the slaughter, you have to pay for the burials, and that's a lot of bodies.

And then you have to pay for the food, the indoctrination camps, and the bullets and the gas for those who don't convert. It takes a very good accountant to keep track of all the religious nuts you've exterminated.  Someone has to keep track of all that.

Otherwise, you wind up like the Soviet Union: Broke, alone, and burdened with the broken utopian nightmares you forced with bayonets and guns upon "the masses."

So Hillary is a capitalist?

She's capitalizing on that distraction, the Muel, who gets paid your dollars to keep the limelight away from Hillary's crimes. We all know about the Muel.  Robert, the Muel, Mueller.

Hillary is banking on not being held accountable for emptying the secrets of our entire government via an unsecure server:  No hacking needed.  You wanted to see what we had, all you had to do was browse.  Who do you think "browsed?"

As a side note:  Legislators cannot get files from the Justice Department or the FBI, but our enemies had access to all our files via the state department, via Hillary Clinton's computers.  Our enemies know what the Hillaristas did, but you can't know.

Maybe we're asking the wrong government for those files.  Maybe we should ask Putin for them.  How much do you think we'd have to pay him for them?

Maybe we should ask Iran.  No.  They got paid billions to keep quiet.

Hillary is banking on that.  She's a capitalist.

Van.


See more HERE...

"THE RUDY AND STORMY PINKO PONY SHOW"

Thursday, May 3, 2018

The Rudy and Stormy Pinko Pony Show...





Ok. A loan to Cohen to pay for what was paid to the porn star.  Then apparently, now, a purported accidental admission by legal genius Rudy Giuliani. 

Get that?  Porn star. Legal Genius oopsie. Presidential Gotcha. 

Why? 

Because that's all they've got to counter the Korea's, the Syria, the Iran, the Caravan, the unemployment stats, the tax cuts, the... get it?

Months ago the Left's gargantuan pariah was going to cause World War III. 

Now the Korean bitter enemies, North and South, are in a Nobel Peace Prize worthy, lovey-dovey date, and the witches and warlocks of the Left have to get that off the headlines at all costs, and Presto! ...

The Rudy and Stormy Pinko Pony Show:

"Look at the Loosie Lawyer with the Porny Stormy ... There's nothing going on OVER THERE!"


Van.




Tuesday, April 17, 2018

A Chronological BOOM! BOOM!





BOYCOTT AGAINST LAURA INGRAHAM BACKFIRES



David Hogg's boycott against Laura Ingraham actually helped her ratings rise by over 20 percent.  That's what a report by NEWSBUSTERS is saying.

Hogg's boycott came about after he accused Laura Ingraham of making derogatory comments about Hogg being unable to qualify to get into college.  She apologized, but Hogg instead of withdrawing his attacks, doubled down on Ingraham, claiming she was only apologizing to save her advertisers.

27 advertisers did pull their advertising from Ingraham's show, but other refused, including the My Pillow company, and Fox news stood behind Ingraham, announcing that they would not "allow voices to be censored by agenda driven intimidation efforts."

Hogg was the student journalist that spearheaded, along with survivors of the Parkland high school shooting, nationwide anti-gun protests, aided by Leftist activists and news media.

Rich Noyes at Newsbusters said that "...Fleeing advertisers may have thought they were avoiding controversy, but they are apparently skipping out on a TV audience that’s clearly quite loyal, and bigger than ever..."

Read the full report HERE...







Tuesday, April 10, 2018

THE ZUCKERCIRCUS




It's the old bait and switch.

For about the last decade  Facebook has baited you with a host of features, under the guise of helping you, and the "world" to be in "better communication."  Here's the way Kathleen Chaykowski put it in her report, when she wrote in Forbes, in the "Tech Section in 2017.  In this she quotes Zuckerberg:
"... When Facebook ... filed to go public in early 2012, Mark Zuckerberg noted that the social network wasn’t originally designed to be a company. 'It was built to accomplish a social mission — to make the world more open and connected,' Zuckerberg wrote in Facebook’s S-1 filing, presenting the business as an engine supporting this goal ..."

You see, he didn't design it to be a company.  It was all for you.  But, fast forward, a few years later, and, well, he made it into a company.  Bait. Switch.  And we all know what the Corporate bottom line is:  $.

And part of that bottom line is to increase profits.  How do you do that in a business model that is based on "free" use?  Change it so that there is an initial "free-use" basic level, and then incrementally charge for additional features. Why would they do it this way?  Because they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.  The cookie jar contained YOU and your personal info which you gave to them so they could make their mega-bucks.  It's a big scandal now, as you may have heard, and Zuckerberg is now going to supposedly get a shellacking from congress, and woe is he, he will self flagellate,  until the cows come home, and then he will make the changes accordingly.

Except, it's all a ruse.

How is it a ruse?  Well let's start with an article by Daniel Lyons in May of 2010 in NEWSWEEK:  Lyons told us that:
"...you might not know about the latest trend among hipster techies: quitting Facebook. These folks, including a bunch of Google engineers, are bailing out because Facebook just changed its rules so that much of your personal profile information, including where you work, what music you like, and where you went to school, now gets made public by default. Some info is even shared with companies that are special partners of Facebook, like Yelp, Pandora, and Microsoft. And while there are ways to dial back on some of this by tinkering with your privacy settings, it’s tricky to figure out—intentionally so, according to cynics..."
Lyons said, also that:
"... The fear is that people are being lured into Facebook with the promise of a fun, free service, and don’t realize that they’re paying for it by giving up loads of personal information. Facebook then attempts to “monetize” one’s data by selling it to advertisers that want to send targeted messages ... Most folks using Facebook have no idea this is happening. Even if you’re very tech-savvy and do know what the company is up to, you still have no idea what you’re paying for Facebook, because people don’t really know what their personal data is worth ..."

Mind you, that was May of 2010.

On March 21, 2018, Zuckerberg, speaking to CNNMoney's Laurie Segall, he says this:




How does he not get struck by lightning?  Makes you wonder, doesn't it, especially since Lyons told us in 2010 that:
"...The biggest problem, however, is that the company keeps changing the rules. Early on, you could keep everything private. That was the great thing about Facebook—you could create your own little private network. Last year, the company changed its privacy rules so that a lot of things—your city, your profile photo, the names of your friends—were set, by default, to be shared with everyone on the Internet. Sure, you could change everything back and make it private. But most people probably didn’t bother. Now Facebook is going even further by insisting that unless you agree to make things like your hometown, interests, and friends’ names public, then you can’t list them at all..."
And, of course, there was also this, again, from Lyons:
"...The whole kerfuffle is a misunderstanding, according to Elliot Schrage, Facebook’s vice president of communications and public policy. In his version of events, the company is simply making changes to improve the service it provides to users by giving them more 'granular' control over what they share, and if people don’t share information they have a 'less satisfying experience.' Facebook is innovating so rapidly, he says, that people don’t fully understand what the company is doing, and that change is scary ... Some critics think this is more about Facebook looking to make more money. Its original business model, which involved selling ads and putting them at the side of the page, totally flopped. Who wants to look at advertisements when they’re online connecting with their friends? Facebook denies that financial motives drove the changes. 'Of all the criticisms, that’s the one I find most distressing—that anything we’ve done is damaging to users in order for us to make more money,' says Schrage..."

Lyons also said in that article that the privacy issue had already landed Facebook in hot water in Washington, and that Senator Charles Schumer and two others had called on Facebook to change its privacy policy, and that they were urging the Federal Trade Commission to set guidelines for social-networking sites.  He said that in May of 2010, "...a group of 15 online-privacy groups filed a formal complaint with the FTC accusing Facebook of 'unfair and deceptive trade practices.' ..."

It is now April of 2018.  See the time lapse here?  What has Zuckerbook been doing for eight years?  Can you say "caching!"

 It gets better.  Actually it gets much worse.  And this is why this is a ZuckerBook Circus:

Zuckerberg is going to testify before a Congressional committee, but Zuck's not going to be Under Oath.  Oh, he's still "compelled by statute to tell the truth," but he's not under oath.  So watch his testimony.  If he claims he didn't know about all this until recently, then he will have lied, will he have not?


And then there is this little anecdote:  FACEBOOK just happens to be a BIG contributor to the committees that are going to be questioning him:  "...The congressional panel that got the most Facebook contributions is the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which announced Wednesday morning it would question Zuckerberg on April 11.

Members of the committee, whose jurisdiction gives it regulatory power over Internet companies, received nearly $381,000 in contributions tied to Facebook since 2007 ..."  according to Herb Jackson at USA TODAY.

AND Paul V. Fontelo, reporter at ROLL CALL, tells us that 30 lawmakers hold stock in Facebook, including THREE who may be questioning the Zuck.


Of course, no one told Mark Zuckerberg back in 2010 about that article in NEWSWEEK by Daniel Lyons. He runs Facebook, but he didn't know about Schumer and Co., and that oh so tiny complaint  filed with the FTC that was so minuscule that he never found out about it.

TODAY he is saying that he swears he found out just two weeks ago that bad actors were harvesting users’ private info by the millions.  Kevin Poulsen, writing for the Daily Beast, intimates he's lying:
"... But the company was alerted long, long before that ... Facebook was warned five years ago that the 'reverse-lookup' feature in its search engine could be used to harvest names, profiles, and phone numbers for virtually all its users..."  
But the company just found out two weeks ago?  (You can read that HERE)


So, have you been scammed?  You signed on to be in communication with your loved ones, your friends, your groups, but in reality you were providing information that Facebook had promised you it would not sell.  In effect you were an unwitting employee of Facebook, and if this is the case, how much back-pay does Facebook owe you for the use of the precious personal data you, your friends, your family, etc., have provided to ZuckBook, so that it could be sold for zillions?

Mark Zuckerberg in an "Open Letter" said this in 2006:
"...I wanted to make sure we did something about it, and quickly. So we have been coding nonstop for two days to get you better privacy controls. This new privacy page will allow you to choose which types of stories go into your Mini-Feed and your friends' News Feeds, and it also lists the type of actions Facebook will never let any other person know about..."  (Read it HERE)


As Rich Lowery put it in a New York Post editorial today, "...Facebook has always been one big swindle.."  

My money is on the money:  I think the purpose of the ZuckerCircus is more money, but not for you.

What are you going to pay for this time?